The Big Platform Switch: Why Teams Move from Vimeo & Brightcove to Dacast
The video streaming industry has evolved dramatically over the past decade. Once a niche space for creative communities, it now reaches hundreds of millions of viewers worldwide—surpassing 29.7 billion watch hours in Q1 2025 alone. Valued at over $108 billion, the market continues to expand, but its foundations are shifting.
Following a wave of acquisitions by Bending Spoons—now the owner of Brightcove (Feb 2025) and in the process of acquiring Vimeo (September 2025) – many broadcasters, OTT providers, and enterprises are reassessing their video infrastructure. When major platforms change hands, pricing models, support standards, and product priorities often change with them.
That’s why more professionals are choosing to switch from Vimeo to Dacast or switch from Brightcove to Dacast, seeking a platform that provides stability, control, and cost transparency without compromise.
For over 16 years, Dacast has remained an independent, professional video hosting platform trusted by enterprises, educators, broadcasters, and government organizations worldwide. Its mission is simple: to be the safe, human, and affordable home for live streaming and OTT video hosting—a platform that doesn’t change under your feet.
In this guide, we’ll explore why businesses are making the Enterprise Video Platform Switch from Vimeo and Brightcove to Dacast in 2025, the challenges driving these decisions, and how Dacast fills the gaps left behind with transparency, reliability, and human support.
Table of Contents
- Why Users Are Leaving Vimeo
- Why Users Are Leaving Brightcove
- Why Dacast Appeals to These Users
- How to Migrate to Dacast Without Downtime
- Head-To-Head Comparison
- FAQs
- Dacast: The Smart Switch for Growing Businesses Leaving Vimeo and Brightcove
Why Users Are Leaving Vimeo
Vimeo started in 2004 as a creative hub for filmmakers and artists. Recognizing the need and demand, it slowly started shifting toward becoming a professional video hosting and streaming platform.
The platform is still going strong, and in 2023, it reported having around 300 million users and 7.09 million paying subscribers. While there are no updated numbers for 2025, some users are stepping away and looking for another professional video hosting platform that solves their initial issues.
Looking at online reviews from long-time users, you’ll easily notice why users switch from Vimeo to Dacast. The majority of complaints focus on the high cost of the platform, as well as a few other significant sticking points.
Pricing Structure and Scalability Challenges
Vimeo’s pricing plans seem to be the biggest issue for existing users. They are structured around caps on storage, bandwidth, and streaming hours. For businesses scaling video output, these caps can result in forced upgrades to the more expensive Advanced and Enterprise tiers.
For example, a company with a modest audience but a growing content library of on-demand video may find itself pushed into contracts designed for large-scale enterprises. And even then, they might face video availability interruptions.
Compounding the problem, Vimeo has yet to offer true pay-as-you-go scalability, meaning customers are locked into flat fees or multi-year agreements that penalize fluctuations in viewership and growth.
Storage and Streaming Limitations
While the entry-level tiers seem attractive at first, they come with restrictions. Businesses with large libraries or consistent live streaming needs often hit the 2TB Standard limit far sooner than expected, leaving them with few options other than to upgrade their plans.
For mid-sized organizations with a few terabytes of on-demand content, Vimeo’s thresholds feel restrictive. This is especially true when compared to platforms that provide more flexible storage solutions or unlimited bandwidth options.
Little Customization
It’s only natural that businesses and organizations want to have their branding visible when streaming, but Vimeo lags behind in this area. The platform does offer some personalization options:
- Player Color and Theme: Change the player’s primary color to match your brand.
- Logo Display: Add a logo to the player, though fully removing Vimeo branding often requires higher-tier plans.
- Video End Screens: Display calls-to-action or links at the end of videos.
- Custom Thumbnails: Upload your own thumbnail images for videos.
However, Vimeo falls short when it comes to full white-label control. The Vimeo branding often remains visible unless you are on Enterprise-level plans. Also, deeper player customizations or integrations into custom apps and websites are restricted.
Complicated Workflow
Another recurring complaint centers around Vimeo’s workflow complexity. What should be simple, such as setting up a live event, managing video libraries, or integrating monetization, is unnecessarily cumbersome and unintuitive.
Many broadcasters report that Vimeo requires unnecessary steps or lacks the flexibility to adapt to unique use cases. These complexities can create delays and added costs for small teams without dedicated technical staff.
API Limitations
While Vimeo’s API covers basics, it lacks flexibility for complex workflows such as automated billing, advanced analytics, or large-scale content syndication. Broadcasters with large libraries often cite challenges with bulk uploads, metadata management, and automation.
While Vimeo provides some API tools, users note that they lack the flexibility of competitors who prioritize developer-first functionality.
Monetization Restrictions
Vimeo allows monetization through Vimeo OTT and Pay-Per-View, but with notable limits. Pricing and promotional flexibility are restricted, revenue shares reduce earnings, and some features aren’t available globally. Vimeo also lacks options for hybrid monetization, such as combining ads with subscriptions, which limits creators’ ability to diversify revenue streams.
Why Users Are Leaving Brightcove
Brightcove also launched its online video platform in 2004. From the start, it positioned itself as an enterprise-grade solution for large organizations. It offers advanced video management, analytics, and monetization tools.
However, that same enterprise focus has become a double-edged sword. While Brightcove continues to serve major corporations well, SMBs are often frustrated with the high costs and complex workflows. Many smaller businesses regularly switch from Brightcove to a cost-effective streaming platform that meets their budget. Another common reason why broadcasters switch from Brightcove to Dacast is the lengthy duration of the implementation.
Enterprise Pricing and High Costs
Brightcove’s pricing is opaque and involves custom quotes, multi-year contracts, and separate fees for various add-ons. Unlike transparent, tiered plans, Brightcove’s model is built for large, corporate budgets. Contracts are typically negotiated at the Enterprise level, which means smaller and mid-sized businesses are often priced out.
Even basic video delivery requires custom quotes, and the platform locks customers into annual or multi-year commitments. Unlike other providers that offer usage-based pricing or pay-as-you-go bandwidth and storage, Brightcove has fixed costs that don’t scale down during periods of low viewership.
Feature Bloat and Complexity
Brightcove has an extensive toolset that is truly powerful, but many customers say it’s overwhelming and that they don’t usually use every feature. The platform does come with:
- Advanced analytics
- Ad management
- Syndication
- Integrations for global broadcasters, etc.
However, smaller teams may only need core hosting, live streaming, and basic monetization. This “all-or-nothing” feature approach can create unnecessary complexity.
Instead of streamlined dashboards, users often navigate through a maze of settings, making routine tasks, such as setting up a recurring live event or adjusting metadata, slower than necessary.
Slow Implementation Cycles
Because Brightcove’s target audience is large enterprises, its onboarding and implementation cycles can stretch for weeks or even months. Some features often require specialized training or dedicated technical staff to deploy effectively.
For smaller teams or content creators, this delay can be a deal-breaker. Where competitors offer self-service onboarding and instant setup, Brightcove’s heavy reliance on enterprise-grade support adds friction, delaying go-to-market timelines for video campaigns.
Limited Mid-Market Fit
While smaller organizations struggle with cost and complexity, enterprise clients generally have the resources to absorb them. This leaves mid-sized companies producing a few terabytes of on-demand content or regular live streams without a good streaming and hosting platform fit.
Such companies often end up paying for features they don’t use or get stuck with underserved plans that don’t fit their scale. In contrast, platforms like Dacast target this middle ground with pricing models and features that grow with the business rather than against it.
Developer Concerns
The feedback regarding Brightcove’s APIs and developer tools often highlights their limitations in flexibility and ease of integration. Bulk video uploads, metadata management, and automation require more effort than developer-first platforms prioritizing clean APIs.
Additionally, Brightcove’s SDKs and integrations sometimes lag behind competitors in terms of updates and support. This creates extra work for in-house development teams that need to build custom workflows, especially for businesses that embed video into their apps or websites.
Why Dacast Appeals to These Users

Even though smaller businesses and individual streamers are stepping away from Vimeo and Brightcove, they’re not giving up on streaming for good. They’re just migrating to online video platforms that bridge the gap these two platforms have created.
One such OTT platform for broadcasters and businesses is Dacast. It delivers the same enterprise-grade functionality, but with the added bonus of transparent pricing, a developer-friendly foundation, and flexible monetization. Let’s see why businesses are moving from Vimeo to Dacast in 2025, and the reasons Brightcove users are making the switch as well.
Competitive, Transparent Pricing
One of the most common frustrations with Vimeo and Brightcove is their opaque or restrictive pricing models. Dacast takes the opposite approach. It presents potential users with clear usage-based plans that scale predictably. Businesses can choose between a set or pay-as-you-go bandwidth and storage, avoiding rigid contracts or sudden forced upgrades.
For startups and mid-sized organizations in particular, this flexibility means budgets can adapt to fluctuating demand.
White-label HTML5 player
Brand control is another priority for modern broadcasters. Unlike Vimeo, which restricts white-label functionality to higher-tier enterprise plans, Dacast includes a fully customizable HTML5 player at every level.
Organizations can embed their own branding, adjust player colors, integrate logos, and remove third-party marks. With Dacast, users have access to:
- An HTML5 player built on hls.js and MPEG-DASH standards, that’s compatible across modern browsers and devices.
- Full CSS control, allowing developers to override the UI, embed custom buttons, or integrate tracking pixels.
- Flexible embed options, including iframe and JavaScript, for integration with CMS, LMS, or apps.
- Closed caption support (CEA-608/708 and WebVTT) for accessibility compliance.
24/7 Human Support
Every Dacast plan includes real human support, available 24/7. Whether you’re troubleshooting a live event or migrating from another platform, you’ll get direct help from people – not bots.
Global CDN Delivery with Multi-Bitrate Streaming
Video delivery speed and quality are a deciding factor for most broadcasters. Dacast delivers content on a global scale through top-tier CDNs, providing consistent performance for every viewer.
Combined with multi-bitrate streaming and adaptive playback, audiences automatically receive the highest possible quality based on their device and connection strength. As part of the standard platform, Dacast offers:
- HLS delivery, which is optimized for adaptive playback and adjusts video quality in real time based on the viewer’s bandwidth.
- Multi-bitrate encoding to transcode streams into multiple resolutions/bitrates (e.g., 240p up to 1080p or 4K) so clients can auto-select the appropriate version.
- Edge caching to reduce latency and buffering in regions like APAC, LATAM, and EMEA, where smaller providers struggle.
- 99.99% uptime SLA via CDN redundancy for uninterrupted delivery of live broadcasts.
Proven Reliability and Longevity
Dacast has powered streaming for 16+ years across education, enterprise, sports, and media. Its stability, independence, and focus on professional users make it a trusted long-term partner.
Built-in Monetization
Unlike Vimeo, which restricts OTT functionality, or Brightcove, which often pushes expensive enterprise ad modules, Dacast integrates video monetization directly into the player and API. This gives organizations fine-grained control over how each video asset is monetized, supporting a mix of models, including:
- SVOD: Subscription packages tied to user accounts, with recurring billing integrations (Stripe, PayPal) and automatic account management.
- TVOD/PPV: One-time purchases using tokenized access links that expire after viewing or a set period to prevent unauthorized sharing.
- AVOD: VAST and VPAID ad tag support allows integration with Google Ad Manager or custom ad servers.
- Hybrid monetization: Mix models per asset (e.g., a free ad-supported clip vs. a paid full-length stream).
This architecture supports programmatic monetization strategies, letting developers or operators manage paywalls, promotions, and subscriptions dynamically via API. Dacast’s is clearly the more affordable Brightcove alternative with monetization tools that give creators more options.
Advanced Security & DRM
The online security of video content is a concern for companies large or small. Dacast has built-in security into the core platform, reducing the need for third-party add-ons or complex configurations. This is done with copyright protection, compliance, and regional licensing restrictions in mind.
Dacast’s security measures meet regulatory compliance standards (GDPR, FERPA, COPPA) while protecting your intellectual property. With Dacast, users have access to:
- AES-128 and AES-256 encryption for stream protection during transit.
- Geo- and domain-restriction to allow playback only from approved regions or whitelisted domains.
- Tokenized access control with expiring signed URLs that prevent link sharing and unauthorized downloads.
- Digital Rights Management (Widevine & PlayReady) for premium or licensed content.
- HTTPS delivery by default for secure playback and avoiding mixed-content browser warnings.
API-first Approach
Dacast was built with an API-first approach, giving developers hands-on control over nearly every part of video management. Unlike Vimeo, which limits automation, or Brightcove, which often feels too complex, Dacast strikes a balance that works for both mid-market and enterprise teams.
With SDKs for PHP, Python, Node.js, iOS, and Android, developers can get up and running quickly. Webhooks make it easy to set up event-driven actions, like updating a CRM when a viewer makes a purchase. With Dacast, organizations can easily create custom OTT platforms, tie video into existing apps, or streamline publishing without restrictions. Dacast offers the following:
- Content management tools for bulk uploading, tagging videos with metadata, and organizing libraries automatically.
- Monetization controls to set up paywalls, check access tokens, and manage subscriptions with ease.
- Real-time analytics that show bitrate, viewer counts, and geographic reach for reporting and dashboards.
- Player customization options to tweak the interface, set up ad placements, manage captions, and add overlays through the API.
Dacast Success Stories
But don’t just take our word for the functionality and usability of Dacast. Hear it directly from their satisfied customers.
Powered by Dacast’s API
Twin Galaxies uses Dacast’s API to run its global video submissions system, where gamers upload proof of achievements directly through the company’s website. With API-driven bulk uploads and metadata tagging, the team efficiently manages a library of nearly 90,000 videos without getting buried in manual work.
Searchable categories make it simple for players and fans to find content by game or competitor. The ability to replace videos without breaking embeds keeps leaderboards accurate in real time.
For Twin Galaxies, the API has scaled with their growing community, cut down on administrative overhead, and created a seamless experience for users globally. As CEO, Jace Hall puts it:
“As we’ve worked with the API and identified problems, Dacast has improved as a service for everyone out there. It has felt symbiotic.”
Driving Revenue with Dacast’s Monetization Tools
For VideoHub, streaming was a new and exciting way of creating additional revenue. With Dacast’s built-in paywall, VideoHub monetizes its content directly inside the video player, offering pay-per-view and subscription models without third-party tools. This flexibility lets them set custom pricing, run promotions with discounts or free passes, and even offer gifts to build loyalty.
The results have been tangible. In just one month, VideoHub attracted over 1,200 unique viewers across more than 10 countries and generated thousands in revenue from pay-per-view sales. Paired with mobile-friendly HTML5 playback, their clients now deliver paid live streams seamlessly to audiences worldwide. As VideoHub CEO Chris Morton puts it:
“We chose Dacast for the integrated pay-per-view options it provided, letting us monetize the stream from our own site.”
How to Migrate to Dacast Without Downtime
Dacast makes video hosting platform migration fast and seamless, whether you’re moving from Vimeo, Brightcove or other platforms. With automated tools and 24/7 human support, most users migrate to Dacast without downtime in just a few days.
Quick Migration Checklist:
- Audit your video library and existing embeds.
- Use Dacast’s bulk import or API migration tools to transfer assets.
- Map metadata, captions, and categories for consistency.
- Replace old embed codes and verify playback quality.
- Configure monetization and security settings.
- Test live streams with Dacast’s support team standing by.
Switching platforms has never been simpler—your videos stay live while you transition to a more stable, transparent, and scalable professional video hosting platform.
Head-To-Head Comparison
Let’s take a look at how each platform fares in a Dacast vs Vimeo and Dacast vs Brightcove comparison.
| Feature / Category | Vimeo | Brightcove | Dacast |
| Pricing | Tiered plans with storage, bandwidth, and streaming caps; no true pay-as-you-go; expensive for scaling | Opaque, custom quotes; multi-year contracts; fixed costs; mostly enterprise-focused; expensive for SMBs | Transparent usage-based plans; set or pay-as-you-go bandwidth/storage; scalable and predictable; suitable for SMBs and mid-market |
| CDN / Global Delivery | Standard CDN delivery, not heavily emphasized | Enterprise-grade CDN options, but less flexible for smaller organizations | Global CDN with Akamai & Limelight; multi-bitrate streaming; adaptive playback; 99.99% uptime SLA; edge caching for APAC, LATAM, EMEA |
| Monetization | Vimeo OTT, Pay-Per-View; limited flexibility; revenue share; hybrid monetization not supported | Advanced ad management, SVOD, TVOD; but expensive modules and less flexible for mid-market | Built-in monetization; SVOD, TVOD/PPV, AVOD, hybrid models; programmatic monetization via API; fine-grained control per asset |
| API / Developer Tools | Basic API; limited automation, bulk upload, metadata management | SDKs available, but often complex and outdated; bulk operations and automation require more effort | API-first; SDKs for PHP, Python, Node.js, iOS, Android; Webhooks for automation; bulk upload, metadata management, custom workflows supported |
| Player Customization / White-label | Some branding options; full white-label often requires Enterprise plan; limited deep customization | Some customization possible but complex; mostly enterprise-focused | Fully customizable HTML5 player at all levels; CSS control; branding/logo removal; flexible embed options; supports closed captions |
| Workflow / Usability | Workflow can be cumbersome; live events and library management unintuitive; restrictive for scaling teams | Feature-rich but complex; steep learning curve; slow implementation; small teams may struggle | Streamlined workflows; self-service setup; intuitive library management and live event configuration |
| Storage / Bandwidth Limits | Tiered storage (e.g., 2TB for Standard); forced upgrades for higher usage | Enterprise-level solutions; less concern for limits but costly | Flexible storage & bandwidth options; pay-as-you-go; no forced upgrades; scales with business needs |
| Target Audience | Creative professionals and mid-sized businesses; scaling is expensive | Large enterprises; not ideal for SMBs or mid-market | SMBs, mid-market, and enterprise; flexible and developer-friendly; bridges gap left by Vimeo/Brightcove |
| Support | Ticket-based | Enterprise support only | 24/7 human support across all plans |
| Implementation / Onboarding | Relatively fast for basic use; advanced setups can be cumbersome | Long implementation cycles; training often required; slower time-to-market | Quick setup; self-service onboarding; API & SDK support speeds integration |
| Unique Advantages | Strong community & creative tools; established platform | Enterprise-grade analytics and ad management; large-scale broadcasting | Transparent pricing, flexible monetization, developer-first, full white-label, global CDN, multi-bitrate streaming, strong security |
FAQs
How long does a migration from Vimeo/Brightcove typically take?
Most mid-size moves (around 250-500 videos) complete in about 24-48 hours. Smaller libraries often finish faster; very large or complex setups can take longer, depending on approvals and how content is organized. Timelines are mainly influenced by access to the source account, naming/organization of your videos, and a few edge cases that may need extra attention near the end.
Is it hard to switch from Vimeo to Dacast?
Switching is straightforward, but there are a few considerations. Vimeo embeds will continue to play while your account is active, but URLs aren’t automatically redirected. To preserve SEO, update your site’s pages with new Dacast embeds or use 301 redirects. Subscriber or PPV data cannot be migrated directly, though Dacast can help you relaunch your paywall.
With guided support, users can maintain workflows while benefiting from Dacast’s flexible player, monetization, analytics, and security features with minimal downtime.
How does Dacast pricing compare to Brightcove?
Dacast offers transparent, competitive pricing with flat-fee and pay-as-you-go options, making it more accessible for mid-sized organizations. Brightcove typically requires enterprise-level contracts for advanced features, often resulting in higher costs. Dacast eliminates hidden fees and forced plan upgrades, allowing businesses to scale video streaming without unexpected charges.
Can I keep my existing video library when migrating?
Yes! Dacast lets you migrate your Vimeo or Brightcove library with ease. By default, the highest-quality video files, titles, and descriptions are transferred. Captions, thumbnails, chapters, and other metadata can also be moved after review. For bulk imports, entire Vimeo Showcases or full libraries can be imported via API, and smaller, custom selections can be migrated by video ID or simple list-based import.
Are there any financial incentives to make the switch from Vimeo/Brightcove to Dacast?
As of November 2025, Dacast is offering discounts of $100 to $500 off first-year subscriptions, plus one free month of service, to give customers of competitor platforms time to migrate their content and properly set up their new accounts.
Does Dacast support live streaming and OTT video hosting?
Absolutely. Dacast is a full OTT platform for broadcasters—supporting live, VOD, and monetized streaming on one dashboard.
Dacast: The Smart Switch for Growing Businesses Leaving Vimeo and Brightcove
There is no doubt that Vimeo and Brightcove are established leaders in video hosting and streaming. However, the slow video hosting platform migration highlights a clear trend: mergers, pricing shifts, and changing priorities can disrupt even the most reliable video workflows.
Dacast remains independent—focused solely on helping broadcasters, educators, and enterprises stream with confidence.
- Safe: Independent platform with 16+ years of proven reliability.
- Human: 24/7 real human support, available during every broadcast.
- Affordable: Transparent, usage-based pricing with no forced upgrades.
- Global: Multi-CDN delivery with data control in North America and licensed access in China.
If you’re looking for the best Vimeo alternative for business or an affordable Brightcove alternative with monetization tools, it’s time to experience Dacast.
Ready to experience the switch? Start your 14-day free trial and see how Dacast can power your video streaming strategy!
To stay up-to-date with the latest news in the world of video streaming and hosting, join our LinkedIn community.
Stream
Connect
Manage
Measure
Events
Business
Organizations
Entertainment and Media
API
Tools
Learning Center
Support
Support Articles